
Do you need a kid’s book? This is a pretty good one!
Check out today’s sponsor, Little Blue Truck’s Valentine! (Not to be confused with 2011 marital bummer flick Blue Valentine)
Amazon Affiliate Link
LONDON, February 17th, 1824 — In a recent session of the House of Commons, noteworthy developments unfolded as representatives from the Bank of England presented a detailed account of the current circulation and valuation of banknotes. Concurrently, documents outlining the backlog of cases within the Court of Chancery were submitted, underscoring the judiciary’s operational challenges. Both sets of documents have been earmarked for publication.
A significant portion of the day’s agenda was dominated by the issue of coal duties, prompted by a petition delivered by the Sheriffs of London and Middlesex. The petition, originating from the Lord Mayor, Aldermen, and Commons of the city of London, assembled under the banner of the Common Council, articulated a fervent plea for alleviation from the burdensome coal taxes.
Mr. Alderman WOOD took the floor, advocating for the petition’s consideration. He expressed optimism that the Chancellor of the Exchequer had been inundated with similar petitions, sufficient to catalyze a reevaluation of what he termed an “unjust and partial tax.” Wood highlighted a broader national outcry for the abolition of coal duties, noting, however, that the capital’s residents bore a disproportionately heavy burden. He pointed out that London and Westminster alone contribute to three-fifths of the total national revenue from coal duties, a stark indicator of the tax’s uneven impact.
The petition was formally acknowledged and scheduled for printing, alongside three analogous appeals. These were from the wards of Aldgate, presented by Mr. Alderman BRIDGES; Cripplegate, by Mr. Alderman Wood himself; and a third from Shaftesbury, introduced by a member whose identity remains unspecified. These petitions collectively underscore a growing discontent with the coal duties, setting the stage for a potentially significant fiscal policy debate.
⁂
The content on this website is for entertainment purposes only.
Much of it has not been thoroughly reviewed by humans,
although we do get a blast from reading it ourselves.
But it should absolutely not be cited
as a source for anything other than itself.
We use OpenAI’s GPT-4 API to extract text
from the public-domain archive of The Times,
and rewrite this to contemporary standards.
Graphics are also largely AI-generated.
This website is supported by advertising and donations!
Please consider supporting today’s sponsor,
Little Blue Truck’s Valentine (not under
any circumstances to be confused
with the award-winning film Blue Valentine,
by clicking here to learn more.
Please also consider making a donation here—
we get so excited every time we hear the bell ding,
and there’s no donation too small!








Leave a comment